![]() ![]() Even better, GNOME 3.22 feels considerably smoother with Wayland. During testing so far (encompassing about two weeks of use as I write this), the transition to Wayland has been totally transparent. What's perhaps most remarkable for a change that's so low-level, and in fact one that's taking a lot of X functionality and moving lower down into the stack, is how unlikely you are to notice it. The clients render locally and then communicate video memory buffers and information about updates to those buffers back to the compositor." AdvertisementĮnlarge / The stock Fedora 25 desktop with GNOME 3.22. As the Wayland FAQ puts it, "the compositor sends input events to the clients. Wayland doesn't actually do much and that's by design. It could also be an X application, some input device or a standalone display server. To make things more confusing the compositor can be a Wayland client itself. Wayland is a protocol for a compositor to talk through. Wayland is not, strictly speaking, a display server like X. To a lesser degree, it also aims to get rid of the X's confusing clutter of accumulated bits that have been bolted on over the years. Wayland's goal is to be easier to develop and maintain. The biggest change in this release is undoubtedly the move to Wayland as the default, erm protocol, replacing the venerable X Server. Not only is Fedora 25 a great release, the updated GNOME 3.22 running on top of Wayland appears to be slick and very stable. Well, Fedora 25 is here with an updated kernel, the bugs appear to be gone, and I have no reservations about recommending it. I called Fedora 24, released earlier this year, " the year’s best Linux distro" but one that I would have a hard time recommending thanks to some ugly kernel-related bugs. However, unlike that systemd transition, the switch to Wayland was so seamless I had to logout and double check that I was in fact using Wayland. This is perhaps the biggest change to come in the Linux world since the move to systemd. Yes, after being pushed back from release after release, Fedora 25 finally defaults to using the Wayland graphics stack (assuming you have a supported graphics card). And they can be summed up in a single word: Wayland. "Cloud" is just a word for "someone else's server," so it doesn't make much sense for Fedora to release a "cloud" distro.īut as interesting as Fedora Atomic is, many of the highlights for Fedora 25 come from the WorkStation edition. Fedora Cloud, aside from having a meaningless name, didn't quite pan out. ![]() Previous Fedora releases also had a "cloud" edition, but with the latest release-Fedora 25, a major update for this Linux distribution-that's been replaced by Fedora Atomic. Further Reading Fedora 24 review: The year’s best Linux distro is puzzlingly hard to recommend ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |